Struggles of Living DACAmented

Struggles of Living DACAmented

Undocumented students do not know any other home than the United States. Young undocumented immigrants are confronted with the dilemma of not having a sense of belonging in the United States nor in their home countries; they are neither from here nor from the other side.

Isael is a 19-year-old Mexican-American man who came to the United States at the age of nine with his family. After going through many economic hardships in the farming community where he was born, his family decided to immigrate to the United States without a visa. By age 12, Isael started working as a gardener.

Isael’s parents wanted a better life for their son. A life that consists of higher education and an opportunity to achieve financial stability. Due to his and his parents’ hard work, patience, and grit, Isael got his “better” life. He is a student at Pasadena City College majoring in business management and working as an electrician to put himself through school.

You interact with people like Isael all day long—they are working in your homes and at the restaurants you frequent. They care for your children and your grandchildren. They wash your cars. And in another generation, like the wave of Mexican immigrants who came before them, they will be your lawyers, doctors, social workers and investment bankers. For now, however, Isael struggles. He is undocumented and is one of the more than 750,000 young immigrants who are protected under DACA—Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.

It is estimated that since the implementation of DACA, in 2012, 50,000-75,000 individuals have entered the workforce and about 25,000 have obtained their GED. Undocumented students are fully integrated to the American culture. They are productive members of society. They pay taxes.

Approximately 61% of DACA recipients have obtained a new job have opened bank accounts, 38% have credit cards and 61% have obtained driver licenses, which broaden their job and economic opportunities. DACAmented students are making every effort to contribute to the economy; they are not here to take jobs or opportunities.

Data shows that about three-quarters or 77% of unauthorized immigrants have received protection through DACA with 60% being Mexicans. In 2014, California was the leading state with more than 216,000 approved DACA applications, followed by Texas and Illinois. Undocumented students face difficult circumstances every day when it comes to funding their education or when searching for a well-paying job.

Undocumented students face bureaucratic challenges in terms of accessing financial aid because institutions require them to provide a social security number even when they don’t have one or if they have it specifically states “only valid with employment card”. It is often the case that undocumented students take more time to complete their degrees and certificates because they lack the resources to integrate into the school system that would offer them guidance and counseling.

Fortunately, in 2011, the California legislature passed two bills that would make college more accessible and affordable to undocumented students. Assembly Bill 130 allows undocumented students to apply for private scholarships eliminating the requirement of a social security number. Assembly Bill 131, on other hand, allows undocumented students to apply for state financial aid in California’s public colleges and universities.

Assembly Bills 130 and 131 provide undocumented students the economic and educational resources they need to continue with their education. The passage of these two bills has provided students with the opportunities to advance in their future careers and create pathways for others who like them have struggled.

Even though California offers financial aid for undocumented students, since the election of President Trump, the number of applicants has declined. It was reported that between January and March, the California Dream Act applications were down 60% compared to the same period last year. For Instance, from January through March only about 17,819 applications were filed compared to 2016 when 46,731 applications were submitted.

If at one point DACA offered relief from deportation, today the future of thousand hard working individuals remain uncertain. The election of Donald Trump has sparked the fear of being deported because with the new administration DACA can be terminated at any point. Living in California has made it easier for Isael to continue with his education, especially after the passage of AB 130 and 131. Isael considers himself an American just like his U.S. born siblings and he should be deserving of every opportunity.

While Isael is protected by DACA, his parents are not and fear being deported. We, the people, should make everything possible for individuals like Isael and his family to achieve the American Dream.

Dear Hate

Dear hate:

I am the antidote to your bigotry and racist rhetoric

I am the one who will fight against the odds

I am resistance and resilience,

I will be your worst nightmare.

 

I will empower future generations;

The ones who will tear down walls of separation

Those walls that divide us between them and us

I will help build bridges that connect us to equal opportunities.

 

In my veins runs the blood of great warriors,

Montezuma, Cuauhtémoc and Nezahualcóyotl will guide me to victory

I am the past, present and future;

I am the conscience of my people.

Fashion Today

Fashion is a symbol of class, but also of expressing one’s uniqueness.  Individuals use fashion to impose themselves and as a way of exerting their power over others. Though fashion can be considered as a cycle, it can also be considered a never-ending trend; which evolves and leaves some in and some out … most are out.

While fashion trends represent an individual’s personality, they can also make an individual part of a social group which he or she might or might not belong to. It is unusual for those at the bottom to set fashion trends … they do not have the means to do so. When those at the bottom have obtained the new fall/winter outfit, fashion designers have already come out with the spring outfit. Those at the top–usually celebrities–are the fashion ‘setters,’ those who have the means to constantly change their clothing styles.

Moreover, while the bottom classes can get away with keeping their fashion style those at the top can’t. They have to separate themselves from the lower classes; they have an image to take care of; and fashion is something that must be change on a daily basis because “one day you are in and one day you are out.”

***Previously Published on my first blog

The OverConsumption of Over Consuming

What is it about fashion trends that drive us to shop with out even considering how much we spend? We are all guilty of over shopping. I am not just talking about clothing trends but also about technological trends. We all have the latest jacket, shirt, jeans or pants hanging in our closets. Jogger pants are so popular almost every one has one—at least I do. But we also have the latest technological gadgets–iPhone 6 or 6 plus, Samsung Galaxy S5, MacBook Pro, Microsoft Surface, and or the 50 inch plasma.Screen Shot 2015-03-13 at 7.41.06 PM

Over consumption comes from our consumption of media. As we drive down the street it is inevitable not to come across an American Eagle, H&M, or Forever21, Best Buy, Apple, Samsung or any other billboards that promote or persuade us to buy any of the items that this brands promote.

Fashion is a cycle! What was in 10 years ago might be the trend this spring season. And what is it that we deem essential to our survival in a society were we are constantly judged by how we look, talk, wear, walk, sit, or eat?

Screen Shot 2015-03-13 at 7.14.16 PM

However, as sociologist Thorstein Veblen social theory of conspicuous consumption suggests, [we] shop to show our social status and place us on the map. We certainly want to have the latest iPhone, iPad, Mac, Galaxy S5, and the upcoming iWatch to demonstrate that we are not so far behind from the “upper class.” We must show our status everywhere we go, just like the leisure class Veblen talks about would in the Victorian era, by “overdressing” and having exuberant hairstyles. However, in this day and age, we show our status by having the phone with the largest screen, but not just any phone, it has to be either apple or Samsung.

And even though we say that how we look or dress does not matter. We are lying to ourselves. How we look and what we wear does matter; it matters to everyone.

Bibliography:

“IPhone 6.” Apple. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Mar. 2015.

Google Images

“Microsoft Surface Tablets.” Microsoft Surface. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2015.

“My Life Powered by Galaxy S5.” Samsung GALAXY S5. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2015.

Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class. Amherst, NY: Prometheus, 1998. Print.

Power, Property, and Machismo

Power, Property, and Machismo

Why should a woman submit under a man’s control? Is it because of what men have between their legs? Or perhaps because over the years it has been the norm society has been set?

Perhaps there is not an answer and we might not really know why women accept the socially constructed idea of control. Truth is that [men] history and society take advantage of what has been done in the past. They have used and unused their “power” at their own will and for their own benefit. And I ask: what have we done to change those socially constructed ideas of what it means to be female and the ever-presence of male dominance? The answer might be a simple nothing.

Everything has been politicized. From women’s sexuality to the role they play in the social, political and economic spheres. And even though women have made major strides to change their political, social and economic situation: they are still underrepresented in congress and earn 77 cents for every dollar a man earns.

Women as property come from the “United Statesian” paternalistic ideology of taking care of the individual in need.

Men have thought that women belong to them, as if they were property bought at an auction. The idea of women becoming a man’s property begins at marriage when women change their last name, and take that of her husband. But who’s at fault for this ideology? It is not just women’s fault for giving up to the idea of “machismo,” it is society for reinforcing the idea.

The portrayal of women on the media reinforces the idea that they are powerless and that all the power resides on the hands of men. Women in almost every case act weak, frail, submissive and passive in the presence of men. This can partly be attributed to the fact that women have always been treated as inferior; the ones that do not deserve to exercise authority over their workplace, home, or lives because the shadow of man in omnipresent.

While the role women play today has change, major changes in the political, social and economic spheres have not been made. The glass ceiling has only been shattered and not broken in it entirety. In the attempt of changing social norms, ones need to start by changing the perception of women and the culture of sexism.